This is the first post in what I am hoping will be a weekly (or something like that) series, in which I will pick up a short story I have enjoyed and examine it, praise it and sometimes just look at it and wonder what it’s all about.
In typically contrary fashion, I have chosen for my first piece a short story which doesn’t have a title (just to keep life nice and simple).
This untitled fragment was published in Franz Kafka’s The Lost Writings (translated by Michael Hoffman and published by New Directions in 2020). It can be read on the New Yorker (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/06/29/the-rescue-will-begin-in-its-own-time) – it’s the second fragment in the set published in that article.
It begins very simply:
A large loaf of bread lay on the table. Father came in with a knife to cut it in half. But even though the knife was big and sharp, and the bread neither too soft nor too hard, the knife could not cut into it.
Nobody describes failure and confusion quite so beautifully, or so logically, as Franz Kafka, and this is one of his best, most succinct explorations. There is so much going on in this short piece and yet, clearly, nothing happens at all – it could be summarised as, ‘A man fails to cut open a loaf of bread.’ Which is a ridiculous premise for a story (but coming up, in a few weeks maybe, we will also have ‘a man gets stuck in a jumper’).
I love the use of the first person plural when describing a shared consciousness and it is especially effective when showing children taking in the adult world. So, we have this mass of consciousness, trying to understand the way the world works and we have the Father, to them a figure who should be able to do everything they cannot do.
Like, for instance… cut open a loaf of bread.
It was only when looking at this again that I realised, having read this countless times, I have never questioned why the father is unable to cut the bread. It seems I swallowed Kafka’s assertion whole:
“Why should you be surprised? Isn’t it more surprising if something succeeds than if it fails?”
This feels like Kafka in miniature – as in The Trial, there’s a difficult, convoluted process (when the children wake the next morning it becomes apparent that the father has spent all night trying to cut open the bread); as in Metamorphosis, there is a physical change to the state of one of the characters as the bread suddenly becomes small and hard:
The bread seemed to shrivel up, like the mouth of a grimly determined person, and now it was a very small loaf indeed.
And with this, it seems to extinguish any hope that “it is sure to give in sooner or later.”
One of the things I love about short stories is that they are self-contained – usually they can be read in one sitting. Stories like this piece of Kafka’s go a step further – there is something very satisfying about being able to see the entirety of a piece of work in front of you. It is there, contained on the one page, as much an object as it is a story.
So, that was the first installment. Maybe it did what you expected, maybe it didn’t. But what did you expect? Isn’t it more surprising if something succeeds than if it fails?